2014 Winter Games
(The 2006 Winter Games are in Torino, Italy, from February 10-26; the 2010 games are in Vancouver, British Columbia, from February 12-28.)
Count no day lost in which you waited your turn, took only your share and sought advantage over no one.
- Robert Brault
According to Heather, the collapse in the West was triggered in summer 376 by one event with huge ramifications: the sudden and quite unexpected irruption of a new and terrifying people into barbarian territory on Roman borders - the Huns. It was pressure from them that drove barbarians (Goths, Visigoths, Franks, Alans) into the Western empire over the next 60 years. The Romans were helpless to stop them... Setting his face firmly against scholarly fashion, which dictates that everything about "Europe" must be "positive" and that no cultures are allowed to be more sophisticated than others, Ward-Perkins argues that the demise of Rome led to a collapse of general living standards from the 5th to the 7th centuries so severe that the result was effectively "the end of civilisation".North Korea
"Kim Il-sung was born into a Christian background, on April 15, 1912 (the same day the Titanic sunk, Kim's critics like to point out)... At the time, Martin notes, Pyongyang had become something of a "Jerusalem" of the Far East, because of the large presence of Christians converted by American missionaries in earlier years... While Kim later played down his Christian background, aspects of the religion - albeit extreme - do seem to have had an impact on his life and style of governance."Beyond even that odd historical angle (and the weird amalgam of sex and violence in the North Korean elite), Martin's book shows that "more than being a modern socialist state, North Korea is, and has been, run along the lines of a quasi-medieval kingdom organized through a bizarre mish-mash of Stalinist communism, ultra-nationalism and xenophobia, hyper-elitism of the ruling class, and Confucian principles of filial piety and obedience to rulers taken to the extreme."
He does much better when describing the opening days of the war itself -- the slaughter, panic and confusion. The Red Army had, for security reasons, opted for cable communications over wireless but in "something approaching criminal negligence, the telegraph lines had been left unprotected on the night of June 21." With their easy disablement by the German forces, intelligence could not be shared. Armies vanished. The Commissariat of Defense lost contact with 10 of 26 special trains that had been sent west. The slaughter was horrific. ".... On average, a soldier died every two seconds." ... Preparations for defense, evacuation and retreat -- treasonous concepts -- were nonexistent.Pleshakov makes another provocative argument, too: "The purge of the officer class in the late 1930s did something even worse than leave the Army unprepared -- it made a military coup impossible. 'The Great Terror saved the dictator and his system; instead of collapsing in the summer of 1941, as it should have, it survived for another fifty years.'"
If nothing else, CNOOC's bid for Unocal is forcing us to prioritize our conflicting ideals. The offer pits traditional nationalism against the conservative belief in free trade and laissez-faire capitalism. It comes as a fire bell in the night for the pure free-traders, what with communist China en route to becoming our chief capitalist rival. Surely there must be some companies -- Boeing Co., say, or Intel Corp. -- whose sale to the Chinese government even the Wall Street Journal editorial board would oppose.Even if it's a bit much, I like that penultimate line about Americans who support the Unocal's sale to CNOOC actually being allied with the Chinese Communist government, the majority owner of CNOOC. This is a deft way to highlight a key paradox of globalization: the fact that "free enterprise" actually expands not through businesses' autonomous activities, but through the work of the governments which shelter - or own! - those businesses. Free trade's a myth. The CNOOC buyout already shows how deeply governments are embedded in trade decisions and will almost certainly elicit more proof as the deal moves along.
This August still another conundrum for the champions of globalized capitalism will emerge. The Service Employees International Union (SEIU), which represents the janitors and is endeavoring to represent the security guards in the high-rises of major cities, will convene in Chicago a gathering of similar unions from around the world.
Whether a global union, or just an alliance of national unions, will emerge from the Chicago meeting is impossible to predict. But global unions are surely coming, and when they do, they'll pose a challenge for polemicists for the new global order. For if the goal of globalization is simply to maximize shareholder value, then the rise of global labor will be viewed as some new pandemic, threatening profit margins with -- oh, the horror -- a fairer distribution of income. But for commentators who insist that globalization is today's way to realize the greatest good for the greatest number, the advent of global unions could force them to stop their ad hominem attacks on their critics as protectionists and compel them to explain what model of globalization they have in mind. Do we stand, with the Chinese communists at Unocal, for the interests of shareholders? Or is America about something more than that?